<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Martin Moore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://martinjemoore.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://martinjemoore.com</link>
	<description>On news matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:11:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;A rock in one hand and a cell phone in the other&#8217; &#8211; on public activism and civic media</title>
		<link>http://martinjemoore.com/a-rock-in-one-hand-and-a-cell-phone-in-the-other-on-public-activism-and-civic-media/</link>
		<comments>http://martinjemoore.com/a-rock-in-one-hand-and-a-cell-phone-in-the-other-on-public-activism-and-civic-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Future of news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knight News Challenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MIT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinjemoore.com/?p=676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post was first published at PBS MediaShift Idea Lab on Thursday 30th June 2011 The smell of public activism wafted across this year&#8217;s Knight Civic Media conference at MIT. Mohammed Nanabhay from Al Jazeera English (AJE) spoke about how Al Jazeera covered the Egyptian revolution. Political consultant Chris Faulkner spoke about Tea Party activism; Yesenia [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://martinjemoore.com/a-rock-in-one-hand-and-a-cell-phone-in-the-other-on-public-activism-and-civic-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal cost reforms will virtually kill off CFAs</title>
		<link>http://martinjemoore.com/legal-cost-reforms-will-virtually-kill-off-cfas/</link>
		<comments>http://martinjemoore.com/legal-cost-reforms-will-virtually-kill-off-cfas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CFAs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Win No Fee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinjemoore.com/?p=673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post was first published at www.mediastandardstrust, and subsequently on the INFORRM blog, on 21st June 2011 The government has just published its legal aid, sentencing, and punishment of offenders bill, including reforms to civil litigation costs – i.e. Conditional Fee Agreements or ‘No Win No Fee’. As it stands this aspect of the bill [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://martinjemoore.com/legal-cost-reforms-will-virtually-kill-off-cfas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open letter to schema.org</title>
		<link>http://martinjemoore.com/open-letter-to-schema-org/</link>
		<comments>http://martinjemoore.com/open-letter-to-schema-org/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Metadata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hNews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metadata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rNews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schema.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinjemoore.com/?p=669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This open letter to Google, Bing and Yahoo!, following the launch schema.org, was first published at www.mediastandardstrust.org on 7th June, 2011 Dear schema.org Let me first say how good news it is to learn about the launch of schema.org. Consistent, structured metadata is a very good thing. Structured metadata will not only help search, it should provide [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://martinjemoore.com/open-letter-to-schema-org/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recipe: Privacy Porridge</title>
		<link>http://martinjemoore.com/recipe-privacy-porridge/</link>
		<comments>http://martinjemoore.com/recipe-privacy-porridge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 11:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eton Mess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MPs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinjemoore.com/?p=665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ingredients Over-heated press campaign Judges (roughly grated) Wild technology Fresh picked MPs Method Take a popular press whose circulations are falling, who are panicked about not being able to publish salacious stories about the sex lives of celebrities, and who glimpse a way to rid themselves of pesky legal constraints Add judges, roughly grated by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://martinjemoore.com/recipe-privacy-porridge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome PCC precedent unlikely to have wider impact</title>
		<link>http://martinjemoore.com/welcome-pcc-precedent-unlikely-to-have-wider-impact/</link>
		<comments>http://martinjemoore.com/welcome-pcc-precedent-unlikely-to-have-wider-impact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 11:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Press self-regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinjemoore.com/?p=663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post was first published at Media Standards Trust on 10th May 2011 The PCC’s adjudication against the Telegraph creates an important precedent where there are currently far too few. But on its own it is unlikely to have a major impact, either in the short or long term, on press practice. The PCC concluded [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://martinjemoore.com/welcome-pcc-precedent-unlikely-to-have-wider-impact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Need for Violence in Microformat War Between hNews, rNews</title>
		<link>http://martinjemoore.com/no-need-for-violence-in-microformat-war-between-hnews-rnews/</link>
		<comments>http://martinjemoore.com/no-need-for-violence-in-microformat-war-between-hnews-rnews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 11:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[hNews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinjemoore.com/?p=661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post was first published at PBS MediaShift Ideas Lab on 6th May 2011 The International Press Telecommunications Council (IPTC) has just launched rNews, a consistent, machine-readable way of expressing news metadata in RDFa (a linked data language). This post explains some of the differences between rNews and hNews and why, if you publish news on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://martinjemoore.com/no-need-for-violence-in-microformat-war-between-hnews-rnews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should there be legal protection for privacy in the internet era?</title>
		<link>http://martinjemoore.com/should-there-be-legal-protection-for-privacy-in-the-internet-era/</link>
		<comments>http://martinjemoore.com/should-there-be-legal-protection-for-privacy-in-the-internet-era/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 11:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinjemoore.com/?p=658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post was first published at Media Standards Trust on 27th April 2011 Most of the current hysterical press coverage of privacy injunctions fails to acknowledge that technological changes are driving the formalisation of boundaries between public and private life. Without such acknowledgment we lack the context to decide if there should or should not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://martinjemoore.com/should-there-be-legal-protection-for-privacy-in-the-internet-era/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is it possible that we’ll never know the truth about phone hacking?</title>
		<link>http://martinjemoore.com/is-it-possible-that-we%e2%80%99ll-never-know-the-truth-about-phone-hacking/</link>
		<comments>http://martinjemoore.com/is-it-possible-that-we%e2%80%99ll-never-know-the-truth-about-phone-hacking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 11:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Phone hacking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinjemoore.com/?p=656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post was first published at Media Standards Trust on 15th April 2011 There is a chance that, despite The Guardian’s investigations, despite the civil claims, despite the police inquiry, and despite the various Commons committee inquiries, we – the public – may never find out what actually happened at the News of the World [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://martinjemoore.com/is-it-possible-that-we%e2%80%99ll-never-know-the-truth-about-phone-hacking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Go explore churnalism.com</title>
		<link>http://martinjemoore.com/go-explore-churnalism-com/</link>
		<comments>http://martinjemoore.com/go-explore-churnalism-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 11:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Churnalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinjemoore.com/?p=654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post was first published at Media Standards Trust on 23rd March 2011 Since churnalism.com launched on 23rd February a lot of people have asked us if they could ‘search the other way’. In other words, could they see news articles that appeared to be based on press releases rather than vice versa. We now [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://martinjemoore.com/go-explore-churnalism-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why churnalism.com should keep highlighting the use of survey ‘news copy’ by the UK press</title>
		<link>http://martinjemoore.com/why-churnalism-com-should-keep-highlighting-the-use-of-survey-%e2%80%98news-copy%e2%80%99-by-the-uk-press/</link>
		<comments>http://martinjemoore.com/why-churnalism-com-should-keep-highlighting-the-use-of-survey-%e2%80%98news-copy%e2%80%99-by-the-uk-press/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 11:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Churnalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinjemoore.com/?p=652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post was first published at Media Standards Trust on 10th March 2011 Surveys are a good way to generate ‘news’. News outlets like to be seen to reflect public attitudes and concerns, and surveys appear to do this. Because of their news value, surveys are frequently commissioned by commercial organisations to promote their products [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://martinjemoore.com/why-churnalism-com-should-keep-highlighting-the-use-of-survey-%e2%80%98news-copy%e2%80%99-by-the-uk-press/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

