Archive for the ‘IPPR’ tag

Andy Burnham at Oxford Media Convention

without comments

At the annual ‘big media’ shindig in Oxford today, at which Andy Burnham – Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, is making the keynote and, in his own words, not ‘playing safe’.

He is making his speech in the shadow of Obama’s inauguration – and like Obama – Burnham spends alot of time drawing of lines in the sand. ’The old media world has ended’ Burnham said, and ‘… with it must go old thinking’. He called this ”A year of decision’, and even went so far as to call for ’Change we can all believe in’. All very Barack.
Burnham said he wanted to get away from ‘fevered and introverted industry debates’. Although then, rather bizarrely, cited the debate about Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand as evidence that the public care about standards, and showed that ‘quality and standards matter’. Curious, that seemed to me more like a ‘fevered and introverted industry debate’.
The government is committed to public service broadcasting provision beyond the BBC, the Secretary of State said, and gave three reasons for this: (1) because it ‘provides range of voices and perspectives’ that is crucially important in, for example, news and current affairs (2) it creates competition which is inherently good for the public and (3) it lays a ‘bedrock of quality’ from which other quality grows.
So what does public service provision mean? Well, news, current affairs and childrens (of course). Non-metropolitan (i.e. London) output. Independent producers. Encouraging risk taking & innovation.
All pretty motherhood and apple pie at this point. Though Burnham then pointed to programming that was missing – even from the Timbuktu end of the cable TV spectrum. More Shakespeare. Programming for the over-65s. Coverage of women and girls sport (?).
Then onto the meat. The ‘public interest’, Burnham said, should be sustained by upholding the BBC and other public service broadcasters. The BBC will have to change, and maybe this means putting ’partnership into the BBC’s DNA’. We should, the Minister suggested, add ‘enable’ tothe BBC’s ‘inform, educate and entertain’.
Local news provision ‘has to rise up the political agenda’. Ahhh, more politicians recognising the crisis in local news (see previous blog). Here Burnham argued we needed to look at all options for new partnerships to help local news – private, public and community bodies. A possible solution might be ‘a national network of local consortium’ he said.
Still, having stressed the importance of local news, Burnham then accepted  that the regional news obligations of ITV should be relaxed.
Finally Channel 4. It is, the Secretary of State stressed, here to stay. But… it may have to have ‘A more specific remit’, it will need to explore partnerships – and not just with WorldWide or Five. Oh, and neither did he shut the door on using the digital surplus.
Hmmm… year of decision or audacity of hope?

Written by Martin Moore

January 22nd, 2009 at 9:50 am

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged with , ,

The policization of immigration 'news'

without comments

There are few better indicators of the increasing political polarisation of the press than their coverage of immigration. Read the Guardian and you’ll come away thinking immigration is levelling off, read the Telegraph and you’ll be convinced it’s escalating dangerously.
Under the headline ‘Migration from new EU states past peak’, Alan Travis reports in the Guardian that ‘Only 8,000 Romanian and Bulgarian migrants came to work in Britain in the first three months of this year’ and that this appears to ‘explode tabloid claims that 300,000 would flood in’. The 300,000 figure came from MigrationWatch and is contrasted with the much lower figure of 56,000 (from IPPR) – which Travis reckons will be proved much more accurate.
Now turn to the Telegraph and Philip Johnston who clocks up three articles on the same page, two about migration and one pointing to more mess-ups at the Home Office. Johnston concentrates on the record breaking 1 million new British citizens in 2006 and quotes MigrationWatch’s Sir Andrew Green’s sinister warnings that ‘we will pay a high price in terms of social harmony’.
The Independent has long since argued for the positive aspects of immigration in its news and comment, and the Mail has argued the opposite.
But the most bitter and bile-filled headline must go to the Daily Express which splashes its front page with ’92,000 East Europeans Milk Our Benefits’.
If you want ‘news’ about immigration, don’t open a newspaper.

Written by Martin Moore

May 23rd, 2007 at 7:08 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged with , , , , ,