Archive for the ‘youtube’ tag

YouTube debates – where questions matter more than answers

without comments

What should we take from the YouTube / CNN presidential debate?

Rather than accepting the over-hyped rhetoric of the debate’s organisers (‘revolutionary’ etc.) or listening to the dismissals by new media gurus (e.g. Jeff Jarvis) it’s worth considering what we can learn about new methods of political engagement from the ‘people’s presidential debate’ hosted on Monday evening.

Its format was similar to the BBC’s Question Time, except that rather than questions being posed by a studio audience they were asked by people who’d uploaded video questions to YouTube. CNN & YouTube picked 39 questions from almost 3,000. These were supposed to represent a diverse spread of political concerns, personal issues, and the distinctly bizarre (e.g. Jered Thompson on gun control).

But focusing purely on the subject matter or the way the questions were phrased slightly misses the point. The key difference was the context. Being able to see people – up close and personal – gave the questions an authenticity and an immediacy you don’t get from normal debates.

Three people (aid workers?) stood behind Sudanese children asking what the candidates intended to do about Darfur refugees. Asked in a studio the question would have seemed worthy, distant, even cliched. On screen on the ground it felt genuine and pressing. Or Kim, 36 years old, who pulled off her wig and explained how she hopes ‘to be a future breast cancer survivor’ but reckons her chances are pretty slim since she has no health insurance.

As Alessandra Stanley wrote in the New York Times, ‘It was not the phrasing of the questions that made a difference, it was the visual impact of the people asking them’.

And though this visual impact did not particularly affect the politicians’ answers – much of them standard pre-rehearsed statements – it almost certainly did, I’d argue, influence the reaction of the audience.

There were alot of shortcomings to this debate – some of which are described by Kevin Marsh on the BBC Editors’ Blog and others by Jeff Jarvis (to be published in Monday’s Guardian) – but if we accept that we’re still just beginners when it comes to working out how new media fuses with old, then there’s alot we could learn from experiments like this.

Written by Martin Moore

July 25th, 2007 at 4:34 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged with , , , ,

Local News via Youtube

without comments

Are overworked, ‘multi-tasking’ journalists on local papers the past or the future? The question occurred to me as I read Professor Bob Franklin and Dr Andrew Williams’ paper about Trinity Mirror’s online strategy (and much else besides, courtesy of Media Guardian). If you care about good journalism and believe in the value of the Fourth Estate it makes for depressing reading.
The overwhelming finding is that fewer journalists are having to produce more stories in less time. To do this they are repackaging more agency copy and PR releases. 92% of the respondents to Franklin & Williams’ survey said they use more PR material than they used to. 80% said they use more agency copy. Journalism, in the words of the authors, ‘has become an office job’. ‘Most journalists acknowledge’ they continue ‘that they are no longer engaged in the critical or investigative journalism which earned the local press the title of “local watchdog”‘.
No wonder, considering that in addition to writing more articles many journalists are being asked to edit content, provide links, and produce video. The result is either poor visual content or ‘journalists relying heavily on pre-packaged sources of video, such as police, PR firms, and even clip sites like YouTube’. And given the video material on the Daily Mirror’s new website, it is clear that this problem is not just restricted to local papers.
Surely heaping more and more roles onto a single journalist is not a workable model for the future? The 21st century journalist cannot be some sort of technological superhuman – researching articles, writing them, editing them, blogging, videoing, podcasting… At some point there has to be an acknowledgement that there is not one type of journalist but many – probably called different things (repackager? filterer? sourcer?). And by acknowledging this maybe we can also make space for the ‘original content reporter’ whose job it is… to collect original content.

Written by Martin Moore

March 13th, 2007 at 5:35 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged with , , , , ,